St Philip Neri on adversity

"There is no surer or clearer proof of the love of God than adversity."

GKC foresees Assisi

Even where we can hardly call the Christian greater, we are forced to call him larger. But it is so to whatever philosophy or heresy or modern movement we may turn. How would Francis the Troubadour have fared among the Calvinists, or for that matter among the Utilitarians of the Manchester School? Yet men like Bossuet and Pascal could be as stern and logical as any Calvinist or Utilitarian. How would St. Joan of Arc, a woman waving on men to war with the sword, have fared among the Quakers or the Doukhabors or the Tolstoyan sect of pacifists? Yet any number of Catholic saints have spent their lives in preaching peace and preventing wars. It is the same with all the modern attempts at Syncretism. They are never able to make something larger than the Creed without leaving something out. I do not mean leaving out something divine but something human; the flag or the inn or the boy's tale of battle or the hedge at the end of the field. The Theosophists build a pantheon; but it is only a pantheon for pantheists. They call a Parliament of Religions as a reunion of all the peoples; but it is only a reunion of all the prigs. Yet exactly such a pantheon had been set up two thousand years before by the shores of the Mediterranean; and Christians were invited to set up the image of Jesus side by side with the image of Jupiter, of Mithras, of Osiris, of Atys, or of Ammon. It was the refusal of the Christians that was the turning-point of history. If the Christians had accepted, they and the whole world would have certainly, in a grotesque but exact metaphor, gone to pot. They would all have been boiled down to one lukewarm liquid in that great pot of cosmopolitan corruption in which all the other myths and mysteries were already melting. It was an awful and an appalling escape. Nobody understands the nature of the Church, or the ringing note of the creed descending from antiquity, who does not realize that the whole world once very nearly died of broad-mindedness and. the brotherhood of all religions.

 The Everlasting Man

 

Pope Pius XII on wars of aggression

Every war of aggression against any ordinance which God gives to man in the interests of peace and bids him respect and endorse, preserve and defend, is a sin and a crime. It is an attack upon the Majesty of God, the Creator and Orderer of the World. If any people threatened with, or already the victim of, an unjust aggression be minded to think and act in a Christian way, it cannot remain in a passive indifference. All the more does the solidarity of the family of peoples forbid the other members to behave like simple onlookers in an attitude of unconcerned neutrality.

Who can ever measure the harm done in the past by such indifference, so far removed from Christian feeling, towards aggressive wars? How pointedly it has given proof of the lack of security among the "great" and, above all, among the "little". Has it, on the other hand, brought any advantage at all? On the contrary, It has only reassured and encouraged the authors and favourers of aggression, by forcing single peoples, abandoned to themselves, to a necessary and indefinite increase of their armaments.

Resting upon God and upon the order established by Him, the Christian will for peace is, accordingly, strong as steel. It is of a temper very different from the mere humanitarian sentiment, too often nothing but a sensitiveness which detests war only because of its horrors and atrocities, its havoc and its dire results, but not also because of its injustice.

In such a sentiment, hedonistic and utilitarian in character, and materialistic in origin, there is wanting the firm foundation of a strict and unconditional obligation. It forms the kind of soul in which the empty sham of compromise takes root, the attempt to save oneself at the cost of others, and in every case the success of the aggressor.

So true is this that neither the consideration of the sorrows and evils following from war, by itself, nor the exact balancing of action and advantage, suffice for a final decision whether it is morally lawful or, in a given concrete case, morally binding, to resist the aggressor (supposing always a well-founded likelihood of success).

One thing is certain: the precept of peace is of Divine right. Its end is the protection of things that constitute the good of mankind, in so far as it is the good of the Creator. Now among these are some so important for human society that their defence against unjust aggression is beyond question fully lawful. The United Nations as a body are bound to defend them, having the duty not to forsake the nation assaulted.

Guide For Living